Entry & outcomes at University of Gloucestershire

Who gets into University of Gloucestershire, who continues, who graduates, who earns a top degree class, and who moves into skilled work — broken down by background. Latest available year: 2023-24. Full-time undergraduates only.

Source: OfS Access and Participation dashboard · Numbers below 23 students are suppressed by OfS to protect privacy.

Who is admitted

Share of new students from each background.

By neighbourhood deprivation

Every English neighbourhood is ranked from most to least deprived. Q1 = students from the poorest 20% of neighbourhoods; Q5 = students from the richest 20%.

Most deprived 20%
12.4%
Q2
14.3%
Q3
21.1%
Q4
25.9%
Least deprived 20%
26.2%

By area participation in university

Areas are ranked by how often local 18-year-olds go to university. Q1 = areas where few young people go; Q5 = areas where most do.

Areas where fewest go to uni
16.3%
Q2
21.3%
Q3
23.2%
Q4
18.9%
Areas where most go to uni
20.4%

By ethnicity

Self-identified ethnicity at application.

Asian
5.5%
Black
6.0%
Mixed
4.4%
White
82.8%
Other
1.2%

By sex

Reported sex.

Male
37.7%
Female
62.3%

By reported disability

Whether the student declared a disability at application — voluntary disclosure.

No declared disability
64.6%
Declared a disability
35.4%

By free school meals eligibility

Whether the student was recorded as eligible for free school meals during compulsory schooling — a marker for low household income.

Not eligible
87.7%
Eligible for free school meals
12.3%

Who continues to year 2

Share of students who progressed past their first year.

By neighbourhood deprivation

Every English neighbourhood is ranked from most to least deprived. Q1 = students from the poorest 20% of neighbourhoods; Q5 = students from the richest 20%.

Most deprived 20%
84.9%
Q2
87.4%
Q3
90.5%
Q4
89.1%
Least deprived 20%
88.3%

By area participation in university

Areas are ranked by how often local 18-year-olds go to university. Q1 = areas where few young people go; Q5 = areas where most do.

Areas where fewest go to uni
85.8%
Q2
87.6%
Q3
86.6%
Q4
88.3%
Areas where most go to uni
90.1%

By ethnicity

Self-identified ethnicity at application.

Asian
90.9%
Black
94.1%
Mixed
92.2%
White
89.6%

By sex

Reported sex.

Male
83.9%
Female
90.7%

By reported disability

Whether the student declared a disability at application — voluntary disclosure.

No declared disability
87.2%
Declared a disability
89.8%

By free school meals eligibility

Whether the student was recorded as eligible for free school meals during compulsory schooling — a marker for low household income.

Not eligible
88.5%
Eligible for free school meals
82.9%

Who completes their degree

Share of students who graduated within the expected window.

By neighbourhood deprivation

Every English neighbourhood is ranked from most to least deprived. Q1 = students from the poorest 20% of neighbourhoods; Q5 = students from the richest 20%.

Most deprived 20%
84.5%
Q2
89.2%
Q3
89.8%
Q4
92.4%
Least deprived 20%
90.9%

By area participation in university

Areas are ranked by how often local 18-year-olds go to university. Q1 = areas where few young people go; Q5 = areas where most do.

Areas where fewest go to uni
90.4%
Q2
92.7%
Q3
90.7%
Q4
90.4%
Areas where most go to uni
94.4%

By ethnicity

Self-identified ethnicity at application.

Asian
82.8%
Black
85.7%
Mixed
86.5%
White
91.2%

By sex

Reported sex.

Male
90.7%
Female
90.5%

By reported disability

Whether the student declared a disability at application — voluntary disclosure.

No declared disability
90.9%
Declared a disability
89.5%

By free school meals eligibility

Whether the student was recorded as eligible for free school meals during compulsory schooling — a marker for low household income.

Not eligible
91.4%
Eligible for free school meals
88.8%

Who graduates with a 1st or 2:1

Share of graduates awarded a first-class or upper-second degree.

By neighbourhood deprivation

Every English neighbourhood is ranked from most to least deprived. Q1 = students from the poorest 20% of neighbourhoods; Q5 = students from the richest 20%.

Most deprived 20%
61.7%
Q2
61.4%
Q3
69.2%
Q4
68.8%
Least deprived 20%
73.4%

By area participation in university

Areas are ranked by how often local 18-year-olds go to university. Q1 = areas where few young people go; Q5 = areas where most do.

Areas where fewest go to uni
55.7%
Q2
70.5%
Q3
70.1%
Q4
75.0%
Areas where most go to uni
71.0%

By ethnicity

Self-identified ethnicity at application.

Asian
53.7%
Black
40.9%
Mixed
62.2%
White
70.7%

By sex

Reported sex.

Male
64.1%
Female
71.2%

By reported disability

Whether the student declared a disability at application — voluntary disclosure.

No declared disability
69.7%
Declared a disability
66.5%

By free school meals eligibility

Whether the student was recorded as eligible for free school meals during compulsory schooling — a marker for low household income.

Not eligible
70.9%
Eligible for free school meals
58.2%

Who moves into skilled work or further study

Share of graduates in highly-skilled jobs or further study 15 months on.

By neighbourhood deprivation

Every English neighbourhood is ranked from most to least deprived. Q1 = students from the poorest 20% of neighbourhoods; Q5 = students from the richest 20%.

Most deprived 20%
60.1%
Q2
75.6%
Q3
74.7%
Q4
75.1%
Least deprived 20%
73.7%

By area participation in university

Areas are ranked by how often local 18-year-olds go to university. Q1 = areas where few young people go; Q5 = areas where most do.

Areas where fewest go to uni
61.8%
Q2
69.0%
Q3
73.9%
Q4
68.3%
Areas where most go to uni
69.6%

By ethnicity

Self-identified ethnicity at application.

Asian
65.2%
Black
79.1%
Mixed
70.3%
White
72.7%

By sex

Reported sex.

Male
70.9%
Female
73.9%

By reported disability

Whether the student declared a disability at application — voluntary disclosure.

No declared disability
72.6%
Declared a disability
72.3%

By free school meals eligibility

Whether the student was recorded as eligible for free school meals during compulsory schooling — a marker for low household income.

Not eligible
71.1%
Eligible for free school meals
59.2%